Subject: Re: Packet received (case: 116101306)
From: "Michael B" <[email-masked]>
To: "Michelle Stallings" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 09:46:56 -0500

Hello Michelle.
The problem is that we are not Corporation Service.  Our company names would be: Labor Law Poster Service, Corporate Records Service, or Council for Corporations.  Corporation Service has never been our company.  Let me know how you would prefer me to proceed.
Thank you,
Michael B
LLPS

From: Michelle Stallings 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 8:35 AM
To: Michael B 
Subject: RE: Packet received (case: 116101306)

Hi Michael, 

Our agent contacted us and according to our agent, the process server that delivered the Writ of Garnishment stated that the service is for your company - Corporation Service. 

If the service is not affiliated with you company, you must return the service to the state or notify the contact party on the garnishment. 

Thanks, 

Michelle Stallings

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Michael B [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 4:00 PM
To: Michelle Stallings
Subject: Packet received (case: 116101306)

Hello Michelle.

I am receipt of a package that was sent to my attention for a Writ of Garnishment.  I do not think this should have been sent to me or our company.  Can you look into this for me to confirm?  Please let me know how to proceed.

Thank you,
Michael B
LLPS