Subject: Re: Fwd: MPA Brief
From: "Michael B" <[email-masked]>
To: "David R. Brake" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:08:20 -0400

Hello Dave.
This company has never ordered from us.  Should they be added to the Do Not Contact lists?
Thank you,
Michael B
LLPS

From: David R. Brake 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:40 PM
To: Mike Bishop 
Subject: Fwd: MPA Brief

Mike:  Is this a repeat customer?   Thanks. 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Tablet

-------- Original message --------
From: Dan Artaev <[email-masked]> 
Date: 03/17/2015 9:03 AM (GMT-05:00) 
To: "David R. Brake" <[email-masked]> 
Cc: [email-masked] 
Subject: RE: MPA Brief 

David – quick question for you and/or Steve. The 2015 labor poster solicitation you sent me – addressed to Anderson Tackman & Co in Iron Mountain – is that a repeat customer by any chance? 

If that’s easy information to find – please let me know. 

Thanks

Dan

_________________________________

Dan V. Artaev

Associate Attorney

The Mike Cox Law Firm PLLC

17430 Laurel Park Drive North, Suite 120E

Livonia, MI  48152

(734) 591-4002

[email-masked]

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2521, and contains information from The Mike Cox Law Firm PLLC which may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, printing or any other use of, or any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at (734) 591-4002 and delete the original message. 

IRS Circular 230 Notice: Federal tax advice, if any, contained in this document and its attachments may not be used or referred to in the promoting, marketing or recommending of any entity, investment plan or arrangement, nor is the advice intended or written to be used, and may not be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties.

Electronic Signature: Nothing contained in this communication is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.

From: Dan Artaev 
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:13 AM
To: 'David R. Brake'
Subject: RE: MPA Brief

No, I think we are ok as is. I don’t want to confuse the issues and create something that is not being used. I don’t think there are any issues with the 2013 instruction sheet/envelope. I just wanted to ensure I had all the right documents. 

Thanks

Dan

_________________________________

Dan V. Artaev

Associate Attorney

The Mike Cox Law Firm PLLC

17430 Laurel Park Drive North, Suite 120E

Livonia, MI  48152

(734) 591-4002

[email-masked]

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2521, and contains information from The Mike Cox Law Firm PLLC which may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, printing or any other use of, or any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at (734) 591-4002 and delete the original message. 

IRS Circular 230 Notice: Federal tax advice, if any, contained in this document and its attachments may not be used or referred to in the promoting, marketing or recommending of any entity, investment plan or arrangement, nor is the advice intended or written to be used, and may not be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties.

Electronic Signature: Nothing contained in this communication is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.

From: David R. Brake [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:10 AM
To: Dan Artaev
Subject: Re: MPA Brief

We are not mailing in WA so there is no 2015 solicitation.  I might be able to get the graphic artist to get one whipped up using our current format if you think that would be helpful.  However, I'm concerned that the changes could be viewed as an admission that there are problems with the 2013 form.  Thoughts?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Dan Artaev <[email-masked]> wrote:

David – quick question for you: Do you have the 2015 corporate records solicitation instruction sheet and envelope you could forward so that we can attach to the motion to dismiss? I have the old corporate records service ones from 2013. If those are fine to use, I’ll use those, but I want to make sure we have the latest. 

Thanks

Dan

_________________________________

Dan V. Artaev

Associate Attorney

The Mike Cox Law Firm PLLC

17430 Laurel Park Drive North, Suite 120E

Livonia, MI  48152

(734) 591-4002

[email-masked]

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2521, and contains information from The Mike Cox Law Firm PLLC which may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, printing or any other use of, or any action in reliance on the contents of this electronic message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at (734) 591-4002 and delete the original message. 

IRS Circular 230 Notice: Federal tax advice, if any, contained in this document and its attachments may not be used or referred to in the promoting, marketing or recommending of any entity, investment plan or arrangement, nor is the advice intended or written to be used, and may not be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties.

Electronic Signature: Nothing contained in this communication is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.

From: David R. Brake [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 9:32 AM
To: Dan Artaev
Cc: Michael Cox
Subject: MPA Brief

Hello Dan:  Attached are my mark ups to the draft of the Brief.  Most of my suggestions are editorial in nature, so feel free to use or disregard in your discretion.  

We need to tell the Judge what we do – that there is a statutory record keeping requirement for corporations.  Many small businesses are not aware of this requirement and their corporate status is in jeopardy if they are not in compliance.  We offer a simple, cost effective way to meet this requirement, with a service that is traditional performed by lawyers and CPAs at a much higher cost.  I know our space is limited so this may have to be fleshed out at oral argument.  

Please feel free to call to discuss further.  Thanks.

David R. Brake

Knaggs, Harter, Brake and Schneider P.C.

7521 Westshire Dr. Ste. 100

Lansing MI 48917

Direct:  (517) 622-2411

Main:  (517) 622-0590

Fax:  (517) 622-8463

[email-masked]